TO THE ATTORNEY’S, AMICUS CURIAE OR ADVOCATES THAT MIGHT BE WILLING TO HELP ME.
THIS IS THE NUTSHELL.
The clearest issue here is
the violation of due process under the
The next supporting
precedence is found under James v/s Singletary 957 F2d 1562 ( 11th Circ
In my case bona fide doubt
may be found when the Hon. Judge F Kaney issued an order for competence
evaluation and appointment of
In reality as far as I can see it the whole issue can be settled within the first few pages of my memorandum of law and the referenced affidavits or cases which you may read by clicking here now and reading pages Viii – iX (handwritten).
I could go on and on as I have done in my pleadings but as this is a NUTSHELL argument I do not expect you to have a nutshell mind and that you be a little familiar with the basic legal issues that encompass this case.
Below I include some more breakdowns and points that you might want to consider:
(b) Pages 21 and 28 of the Transcript of may 10th 2K01 or pages 124 -125 of the record (to 5th DCA) here the Judge admits not knowing the reference mentioned nor does it stop to check it out yet still “ the previous Judge was right attitude” where’s “pate” specifically says a colloquie is not enough.!! Emphasis on page 125 line 13.. I do not know.
(c) Pages 11 and 12 of the Transcript May 10th 2K01 or Record pages 112 -113 Mr Davis the prosecutor and the court in this pages is the essence of the “pate claim” acknowledged yet not recognized!!.. is this not amazing or what. Could it be called Negligent a conspiracy.. you give it a name please.! Now see Nedd v/s Wainright 449 So 2d 982. Since no state competency has been held and the defendant was adjudicated guilty without such hearing then the issue is not whether the record supports a finding of competency rather the inquiry of the habeas is whether the State denied the Defendant his right to to due process by ignoring the evidence indicating that the Defendant might not be competent.
THERE ARE MORE ARGUMENTS IN THIS CASE THAT REALLY MATTER AND POSE WONDERFULL CHALLENGES TO STABLISH LAWS AND PROCEDURES HOWEVER THIS IS OR SHOULD BE MORE THAN SUFFICIENT TO WIN THE CASE WHEN PROPERLY PRESENTED ON A COURT OF LAW.
WHAT IS YOUR OPINION.? E-MAIL ME………………………………….>
& MIA's Interstate will send a free POW/ MIA decal to anyone who sends a
self-addressed self-stamped legal size envelope to 4210 Pow's /Mia's Memorial
Drive, St Cloud.
Sorry but due to high demand and due to financial restraint's the pow/mia decal's are not longer being given out I regret any inconvenience this might of caused you and all letter's that have been received are kept safely once the money flow's again I will begin to send them out again and will once again advertise so nation wide as before.